Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 1161 - 1180 of 3,988
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2018, 6:01 pm by Bona Law PC
The Chinese vitamin C sellers argued that they are shielded from US antitrust law liability by the act-of-state doctrine. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:01 pm by Bona Law PC
The Chinese vitamin C sellers argued that they are shielded from US antitrust law liability by the act-of-state doctrine. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm by The Ansara Law Firm
This past Independence Day many went and enjoyed one of the numerous professional fireworks displace across the State of Florida. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm by The Ansara Law Firm
This past Independence Day many went and enjoyed one of the numerous professional fireworks displace across the State of Florida. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:26 am by Venkat Balasubramani
A couple of decisions from federal courts in other states have come to the same conclusion. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
Wayfair, in which the justices voted last week to overrule two prior cases that prohibited states from requiring out-of-state retailers who don’t have a store or warehouse in the state to collect tax on sales to state residents, “a win for physical retailers and the landscape we should have where all sellers can compete evenly. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
In other words, it’s intended to avoid rather than foster disagreement and litigation between buyer and seller. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm by Steven Boutwell
  Accordingly, sellers qualifying as “dealers” under state law should collect state taxes at the 4.45% rate as of the effective date of July 1, 2018. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:37 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
As Justice Kennedy explained: The physical presence rule has long been criticized as giving out-of-state sellers an advantage. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm by Beth Farmer
However, the majority stated, “commercial realities” may require inclusion of different products or services in a single market, citing United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:12 pm by Adam Levitin
The Supreme Court handed down a disastrous antitrust opinion in Ohio v. [read post]