Search for: "Simon v. Simon" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 41 [week ending on Sunday 12 April] – Nagoya Protocol for dummies | The IPKat and his friends | Actial Farmaceutica Lda v Claudio de Simone | Article 5(5) of the EU's Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 | Article 16(3) of our beloved TRIPS | Italy v Spain in copyright enforcement online. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:43 am by CMS
The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed Bott’s appeal, Lewison LJ gave the leading judgment, with which Simon and Lindblom LJJ agreed. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  Last Week in the Courts On 5 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Gross, Simon and Peter Jackson LJJ) heard the appeal in Bukovsky v CPS. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The First Department held otherwise in its March 19, 2015 decision in Buckingham v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 12:37 am by Peter Mahler
Simon v Moskowitz  The Appellate Division, First Department’s decision last year in Simon starkly illustrates the impotence of minority LLC members compared to minority corporation shareholders when it comes to majority overreach, due to the LLC Law’s omission of a dissolution remedy for majority oppression. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 6:10 am by Matt Cooper
Simon, the Minnesota Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking to prevent the state from certifying election results and asking for a statewide, bipartisan election audit. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 4:04 am
This case is a good example, and Justice Simons's opinion collects and reflects the various cases that hold that even, as here, when the judgment hasn't even been entered yet we're still unwilling to tinker with it in light of things we now know to be true. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]