Search for: "Smith v. Smith"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 14,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2011, 9:16 am
Smith, et al. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 9:53 am
Early last week the Court of Appeals reversed a decision of the First Department which held that the rule of law announced in People v Catu applies retroactively to pre-Catu convictions (People v Smith, 132 AD3d 511 [1st Dept 2015]) -- a decision I had labeled a "huge success for the criminal defense bar" in an October blog post.In People v Catu, the New York Court of Appeals held that the court must advise a defendant of the post-release… [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- One of the many changes introduced into U.S. patent law by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act were provisions for post-grant review (PGR) and inter partes review (IPR). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:17 pm
Knowles (Case No. 11-1450) to decide the following issue: Whether, after Smith v. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
In Judge Smith’s view, the Thornhill panel changed Ninth law (LeMay) with no intervening Supreme Court decision: a Miller v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 7:47 pm
By Cindy Caplan and Jing Li In Smith v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
A divided Sixth Circuit panel this morning in US v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 12:25 pm
Here is the abstract: In Employment Division v. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 6:08 pm
Smith Download Standard Podcast [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 8:45 am
Smith (Possession of narcotics; Motion to correct illegal sentence). [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 2:19 pm
Brennan Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
Smith Marinello v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 4:26 am
Smith, 2008 U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
JoAnn Smith, et al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
[Defendant standing must exist at all stages of any litigation and must be raised by the justices of the Supreme Court even if the litigants themselves fail to raise it] On Thursday, April 25th the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:55 pm
Here is the abstract: This essay was part of a Cardozo symposium celebrating the twentieth anniversary of the landmark free exercise case, Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:08 am
Holley v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 12:59 am
Smith, Rompilla v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:21 am
As the Chief Justice explained in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 4:47 am
Me neither, until I read Smith v. [read post]
