Search for: "State v. Allen"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 2,737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
The panel members were Mattias Zigann, the presiding judge of the Munich Regional Court, Philip Kerr of Allens Linklaters and Larry Welch, the Senior Director, and Assistant General Patent Counsel at Eli Lilly and Company.Mr Ludwig explained that the question of what relief was appropriate had been highlighted by the very recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in AMGEN INC & ors v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 7:36 am
Additional Resources: Allen v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
This duty does not require the state toinitiate a particular investigation; its obligations are met by ensuring that there is a suitable system in place.[2] However, in England and Wales, the traditional style of inquest, as considered in the case of R v HM Coroner for North Humberside and Scunthorpe, Ex p Jamieson,[3] is a significant means by which the state meets this obligation. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:46 am
State, No. 101,078 (Shawnee)State appeal (transfer)Jean K. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:01 am
Bordo and John V. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 5:38 am
Following up on its story July 17th (see this ILB entry) on Monday's Court of Appeals decision in Anita Stuller, et al v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
Taking its decision in People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:40 am
On 14 April 2022 Recorder Allen KC gave a supplemental judgment and lifted the stay of the order of 25 March 2022. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
Today’s second argument is in Allen v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
(No. 3) [2006] QB 125, OBG Ltd v Allen [2008] 1 AC 1, McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73, Imerman v Tchenguiz [2010] EWCA Civ 908; [2011] Fam 116, the Court of Appeal observed that, leaving aside the circumstances of its “birth”, there was nothing in the nature of the claim itself to suggest that the more natural classification of it as a tort is wrong ([43]). [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:49 am
Professor Theodore Allen at the Ohio State University found that lengthy ballots were responsible for long voting lines. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
Allen Stanford to 110 years in prison for master-minding a decades-long $7 billion Ponzi scheme, the Justice Department announced that day (United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:09 am
Allen J., 127 F.3d 1292, 1295-96 & n.3 (10th Cir. 1997) (No. 96-2276), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1013 (1998) Read more [read post]
