Search for: "State v. Baker"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 2,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2011, 9:48 am
Saying Baltimore had the right idea, Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
The First Circuit noted that any arguments that either presume or rest on a constitutional right to same-sex marriage are foreclosed by Baker v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am
Remember when a Colorado state senator tried to change the law to create such a right? [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 1:00 pm
Stanford), had earlier filed their own intervenor motion and supporting paper, in S.E.C. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:30 pm
(By the way Bill, 4 is not the record for a single day, on 30 Sep 2005 for instance, CAAF decided 6 cases and I suspect that CAAF has done more on previous end-of-term days).United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 4:46 am
Istituto Bancario Italiano SpA v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm
And in another platform v. press, story, TikTok's parent ByteDance has been accused by Forbes of planning to use TikTok to monitor the location of specific Americans. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
In North Carolina v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:47 pm
CAAF's new opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:34 am
State of Indiana (NFP) S.G. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:52 am
In the 2005 Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 3:03 am
In Williams v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:33 pm
Baker, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 128 S. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:32 am
It’s not hard to find support for that view if you compare United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
The first is Murphy v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:25 am
Nornes v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:14 am
Image via WikipediaIn a 12-page decision, a three-judge panel of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit last week ruled an ex-Wall Street Journal reporter was protected by New York's shield law from having to testify in a former client's civil suit against Goldman Sachs.In Baker v. [read post]
