Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 7,501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2013, 6:52 am
Georgia, 219 Ga. 345, 133 S.E. 2d 367 (Ga. 1963); State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
” Eldred v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
” Eldred v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:46 am
O’Leary v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:30 am
Benney v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
The investigating body sent a confidential Letter of Request to a foreign state seeking information and documents relating to him. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 1:41 pm
He case is Green v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:55 am
Holder Suisse S.A. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:00 pm
… In Kindred Nursing Centers, L.P. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 9:53 am
State and Crain v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
In June, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in City of Ontario v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:36 am
Norris v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
On appeal, however, it was found that the mark had become distinctive, within the meaning of Article 7(3), in the German and English-speaking member states. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:55 pm
Max, Obodo v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
In the Gambia v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 2:31 am
In addition, since United States is the most important trading partner for the EU, those who specialise in umbrella trade should be expected to consult the USPTO register.Design in Case T-23/13In respect of the parameters for assessing distinctive character, the Board of Appeal concluded that the freedom of the designer was limited when applied to the shape or size of an umbrella. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:13 pm
The court says these allegations are enough to state a claim, so it rejects Hertz’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 8:40 am
State,849 N.E.2d 556, 562 (Ind. 2006); Williams v. [read post]
