Search for: "State v. Denny" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
“The regulatory history of the HIPAA demonstrates that neither HIPAA nor its implementing regulations were intended to preempt tort actions under state law arising out of the unauthorized release of a plaintiff’s medical records,” Justice Flemming Norcott wrote for a unanimous court in Byrne v. [read post]
“The regulatory history of the HIPAA demonstrates that neither HIPAA nor its implementing regulations were intended to preempt tort actions under state law arising out of the unauthorized release of a plaintiff’s medical records,” Justice Flemming Norcott wrote for a unanimous court in Byrne v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
The plaintiffs, Dennis Peet and Jeemell Spencer, further seek to hold the City of Detroit liable for the officers' alleged constitutional violations. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:51 am
Distinguishing the House of Lords decision in Denny-Mott and Dixon v James Fraser and Co, the judge held that the contract between the Club and IRISL was to provide indemnity insurance and that "[p]art of that purpose remained lawful. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
The first is in Monasky v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm by Michael Stevens
Bailey     Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 09a0022p.06  Dennis Pennington v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm by Michael Stevens
Bailey     Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 09a0022p.06  Dennis Pennington v. [read post]