Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 1161 - 1180 of 9,696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2010, 1:14 pm by admin
The Supreme Court’s June decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:28 pm by Beard Stacey & Jacobsen, LLP
Arguing that the undocumented worker was precluded from compensation benefits because he was ineligible to work in the United States, the employer argued that the injured worker was similar to a “car thief,” a “pirate,” or a “drug dealer” who was making money through “ill gotten gains.” [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am by Ashwin Varma
This first post will discuss the overall biopharmaceutical market and the FTC’s stated theory of harm. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Gabriel Chin analyzes Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:53 am
The Supreme Court soundly rejected State Farm's argument that the Dees would be gaining a double recovery if it were now allowed to set off the benefits. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:16 am by Kevin Kaufman
Capital Gains Tax Liability on Asset Sold Immediately with Step-Up in Basis Source: Author’s calculations Value of Capital Gains at Time of Acquisition $2.5 million Value at Time of Death $6 million Capital Gain Under Step-up in Basis $0 Capital Gains Tax Rate: 23.8% Capital Gains Tax Due: $0 Table 2. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Treating groups in the collective bargaining unit differently does not always constitute to a violation of the union's duty of fair representationCalkins v Police Benevolent Assn. of N.Y. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:48 am by INFORRM
In AAA -v- Rakoff [2019] EWHC 2525 (QB) Mr Justice Nicklin set out the importance of claimants (and their lawyers) setting out a clear and consistent basis for seeking anonymity in civil proceedings. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am by Neil Wilkof
Reference was made to various cases, including Morison v Moat (1861) 68 ER 492, where Turner VC held that “the Court fastens the obligation on the conscience of the party, and enforces it against him”, and Smith Kline & French Laboratories v Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 17 IPR 545, where Gummow J stated that “an obligation of conscience is to respect the confidence, not merely to refrain from causing detriment to the… [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]