Search for: "State v. Harding"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 18,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am
U-Haul and Hall v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
(Orin Kerr) This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 10:00 pm
In Hsueh v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:51 am
See, e.g., Welch v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am
However, unless there has been a significant change of circumstances since the order was made, grounds for variation of it under s 31 seem hard to conceive [15]. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:31 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:07 pm
Epps v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:41 pm
In New York v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
But it does, according to the state’s Third Court of Appeals’ recent opinion in Combs v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 2:15 pm
But the memorandum disposition doesn't elaborate on the facts, so it's hard to tell why the court thought this case warranted a departure from the statement in State Farm v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
Lopez, Tax Rulings and State Aid: Now or Never, in Guest State aid blog, 27.11.2014, accessible at: https://www.lexxion.eu/en/stateaidpost/tax-rulings-and-state-aid-now-or-never/. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:45 am
" So it's possible this case may be decided in favor of the state without causing too much damage. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:15 pm
Mediacom Southeast LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am
(David Kopel) To me, today’s decision of the United States District Court for the District of Utah in Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:47 am
In State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm
App. 2005); State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm
The first, which Jack emphasizes, is the theory that the "extended republic" will make it hard (perhaps impossible) for a selfish "faction" to gain control over the national polity, unlike the states, which Madison, at least at that time, viewed as little more than cesspools of faction. [read post]
