Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 1161 - 1180 of 8,246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 A compelling point is raised by Justice Khampepe when she reminds us that South Africa is a non-examination state, i.e. the state does not check whether an invention is novel before it is registered as a patent. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am by Florian Mueller
As per publication in the patent journal, the patent legally takes effect.Art. 139 of the [German] Patent Act states in its current form:(1) Against him who practices a patented invention in violation of articles 9 through 13, the holder of the infringed patent is entitled to an injunction if there is a risk of a recurring violation. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 7:28 am by Currin Compliance Services
Monitor, assess, or identify risks and sources of risk, or develop strategies to minimize risk;V. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am by Shannon O'Hare
Otherwise, they would be facing administrative or criminal proceedings under the laws of each Member State. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 7:10 am by Florian Mueller
Lenovo, by the way, is not merely defending itself super-successfully against Nokia's infringement cases, but also brought a FRAND complaint against the failed handset maker in the Northern District of California late last year (allegations of ambush tactics included).The state of play in Nokia v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 3:01 am by Dennis Crouch
“Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants in that they transact business in the State of Illinois and in the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:38 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
In this case, the SEP holder undertakes to grant a FRAND license in relation to ETSI. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Reject of three possible approaches: (1) solely determined by national law, given that it’s mandatory and normative; (2) informed by relevant state practice; (3) synonymous with three-step test. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm by Russell Knight
Because each year of service contributes to the overall value of the pension, the marital portion of the pension increases in value the longer the pension holder works. [read post]