Search for: "State v. Jordan"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
Jim Jordan said it was “scary stuff. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
In The New York Times, Miriam Jordan reports that the court’s ruling has cast doubt on the prospects of refugees seeking resettlement in the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 7:43 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 4:22 pm
Since that decision, Baze v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm
Even in the case of H3H3 v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm
The alliance would initially include Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as well as Egypt and Jordan, with the United States providing military and intelligence support. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:17 am
“Lawyers can safely act on the facts stated by their clients. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 12:00 am
Jordan M. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
S. 873 (1975), and United States v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 6:03 pm
Jordan, (9th Cir.2010).Judge Koh denied the motion to dismiss. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in Paracha v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:39 pm
The U.S. special forces soldiers killed while entering a military base in Jordan earlier this month were involved in the CIA effort to train Syrian rebels, the Post reports. [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:56 am
Lawfare liveblogged both yesterday’s oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
Giving the Opinion of the Court, Judge Jordan stated that it was obvious that the false advertising dispute was a "proxy for the real fight the parties want to have" over the right to the exclusive use of the HAVANA CLUB mark. [read post]
