Search for: "State v. Lyles" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,491
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 6:50 pm by Anna Christensen
United States (to be argued tomorrow) – and we have updated the pages for those cases accordingly. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:16 am by Jay Willis
United States and Padilla v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:37 am by Anna Christensen
Below, Stanford Law School’s Jacqueline de Armas recaps Tuesday’s ruling in Graham County Soil & Water Dist. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:06 am by Anna Christensen
”  Lyle Denniston also covered the Shady Grove ruling at SCOTUSblog on Wednesday. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
United States and Barber v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:32 am by Austen Parrish
  Not only are extraterritorial laws inherently undemocratic (regulating foreigners, with no say in domestic political processes), but they also can retard and interfere with the creation of meaningful harmonized international, state-to-state agreements. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
CORRECTION: The holding described in this LiveBlog for Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
United States ex. rel. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:44 am by James Bickford
  As Lyle Denniston reported for this blog, in Speechnow.org v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm by Lisa McElroy
Probably most of note this week were the Court’s orders, as noted by Lyle on Monday. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
  The Los Angeles Times, CNN, Houston Chronicle, AP (via NPR), and Lyle at this blog offer background on the case. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:32 pm by Steve Hall
  The Court has not yet scheduled its consideration of his pending appeal (Skinner v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am by Adam Chandler
Lyle Denniston of this blog covered the development on Monday. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:55 am by James Bickford
  On Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog, Ashby Jones discussed the West Virginia Senate vote to offer public funding to candidates for the state supreme court in the aftermath of Caperton v. [read post]