Search for: "State v. M. V."
Results 1161 - 1180
of 29,334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
That was the issue in today's ruling in People v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 2:44 am
Under Dunaway v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Case date: 05 December 2023 Case number: No. 22-1006 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am
In Nimkoff v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
”As for the purported travel restrictions, the AD1 agreed that it was up to the State Department (not the courts) to remove any restrictions on his passport, so that the father could return to the United States.Apparently, his arguments didn’t travel well, either.# # #DECISIONVelin M. v Bermet T. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:16 pm
In particular, NAGR and Bevis pointed to the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Roberts's memo states the point clearly. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:44 am
Despite that, I’m sure the plaintiffs will appeal this ruling back to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm
Also consider that on Monday, December 11, 2023, in State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:34 am
Unless I'm missing something, Valdez joins the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's ruling in Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 8:56 am
by Dennis Crouch CTD Networks v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Recently, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:09 am
Ortiz, and United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:12 am
Mass.) in Steiner v. eBay, Inc. [read post]
