Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 19,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2018, 10:32 am
Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court likely to apply excessive-fines ban to states. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
Madison and Brown v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:04 am
Saeilo Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:23 am
" State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
And who on planet Earth would ever think up a question like this, if it wasn't for the persistent attempts of the CJEU and Europe's finest IP lawyers to categorise confusion as a state of law rather than as a state of fact?]. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
The case must be viewed upon its own particular facts and, as Sir Mark stated, horses had been a prominent feature in the lives of both of these parties. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
This shift in Washington State, as discussed here, marked the beginning of the end. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
Mark Sveen and respondent Kaye Melin were married in 1997. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
By Dennis Crouch Blackhorse v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:58 am
Americash Loans, LLC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:51 pm
In Mobile Mark, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 3:27 am
Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
The Board reversed a Section 2(e)(4) refusal to register the mark ROMANÓV for decorative eggs made of precious metals, jewelry, and picture frames, finding that the mark is not primarily merely a surname. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:34 am
Mil-Spec Monkey, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:31 pm
Bank v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:40 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:40 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
Legal Writing Pro Ross Guberman offers an analysis of Wal-Mart’s brief in the recent United States Supreme Court case Wal-Mart v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 12:03 pm
"Court casts doubt on states' global warming suit": Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:16 am
MTD and Hormel v. [read post]