Search for: "State v. Martinez"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,777
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2011, 12:23 am
Here are the granted issues in Sweeney: WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT’S RULING IN MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:39 pm
Martinez argued that the decision should be made by the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:16 am
I offer a similar analysis of Bob Jones University v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 6:29 pm
Martinez. [read post]
7 May 2011, 4:55 am
These funds had been earmarked as forfeiture proceeds for the victims in the Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme in Florida (United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:02 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm
Martinez, 686 F. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Martinez-Cid, Podhurst Orseck, Miami None 11 $152,000,000 Products Liability Estate of Evans v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
A year later, Vilma Martinez, the first known Mexican American woman to appear before the Supreme Court, argued East Texas Motor Frieght Sys., v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:45 am
When determining a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), "the standard is whether the pleading states a cause of action," and "the court must accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory'" (Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180, 1180-1181, quoting Leon v Martinez,… [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
In Martinez v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
He made some policy arguments about how the statute is to be liberally construed (recently reiterated in the Martinez v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:40 am
United States Court of Appeals Sentencing Prior arrests; preponderance of the evidence; harmless error Although it was error for the district court to consider two prior arrests based solely on the fact of arrest, the error was harmless. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Siegel, Before (and after) Roe V. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:07 pm
In Green v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez et Robert Martinez v Société MGN Limited. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:05 am
Two other of the plaintiffs are a couple engaged to be married seeking to have a secular ceremony in a romantic location of their choosing.UPDATE: Here is the full text of the complaint in Martinez v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:27 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977). [read post]
