Search for: "State v. Neil"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 3,000
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
In her post CJEU rules that warehouse storage of counterfeits due for sale falls within scope of distribution right, Kat Eleonora analyses the CJEU's decision, which endorses the AG's recommendations.Trade marksKat Neil's blue shirtStarting from a remark on the specific hue of his blue shirt, Kat Neil recalls the occasions when he received official actions in trade mark matters stating there was confusing similarity based on the identity of concept of… [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
In Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers yesterday’s order inviting the United States to weigh in on Ridley School District v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
White supremacists probably expected Plessy v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm
Business Solutions v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:37 am
In arguing for reversal, the United States relies on Demore v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:23 am
Gee v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Monday’s decision in Herrera v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:26 pm
Last summer, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg called Gill v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm
This is a well-known 1955 precedent about regulation of eyeglass prescriptions that permits state regulation based on any hypothetical rationale a state “might” have had in mind, even if there is no indication that the state ever thought about that policy and, instead, a lawyer for the state conjures it for the first time from whole cloth in litigation. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
After Mark breaking post, here's our own Neil's insightful piece on that happy-ending story.* The final curtain in the GOLDBEAR sagaThe word "end" in the Haribo v Lindt golden chocolate bear litigation (see IPKat posts here, hereand here) has just been put by German Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
[Correction: An earlier version of this post stated that Kennedy’s opinion in Murr v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
I cannot imagine that its proposed amendments would in fact gain the support of the constitutionally-required three-quarters of the states (which means, further, the support of at least 75 separate legislative houses in the same 38 states, assuming that one of them is Nebraska). [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Question: Henson v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm
United States or Printz v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am
In a CNN interview after Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement, Collins told Jake Tapper that she “would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning, and for this reason, one of our landmark free speech cases [West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:28 am
Ruth V. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:48 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 1:57 pm
United States of de minimis extensions to traffic stops abrogated or limited Arizona v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:36 am
Kisor v. [read post]
