Search for: "State v. Outing"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 90,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2014, 3:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 6:41 am
Chaney v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 3:15 pm
See Conant v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
27 May 2018, 8:27 pm
Based on the Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:13 pm
Which gets called out by Chief Judge Kozinski for (1) doing a bad job, and then (2) trying to get out the consequences of this (alleged) malfeasance by convincing -- successfully, I might add -- three district court judges down here (Judges Burns, Benitez, and Collins) to refuse to accept the unconditional guilty pleas of various criminal defendants.No dice, he holds. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:30 am
In the end, the Court of Appeals rules in favor of a prison inmate who was denied the use of his motorized wheelchair.The case is Wright v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:26 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 8:20 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
The court did not decide whether an out-of-state law could serve as a predicate for a UCL claim because no out-of-state laws were involved.Process Specialties, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 6:54 pm
The case, Garvey v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
” The state justices said they agreed with the trial court in this case that Bush v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 10:13 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
The law applicable before today, the Supreme Court’s decisions in Bellas Hess (1967) and later in Quill (1992), held that a state may not impose a use tax collection obligation on an out-of-state taxpayer unless that taxpayer has more than a de minimis physical presence in the state. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:55 am
Employees of a state as an employer may not sue their employer for alleged violation of the ADEA or similar acts of CongressKimel v Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 Section 58 of the Civil Service Law sets out minimum and maximum age qualifications for initial appointment as a police officer by political subdivisions of New York State other than the City of New York. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Recently, in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:56 pm
")The Hodjat's attorney doesn't exactly come out smelling like a rose either. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
