Search for: "State v. Prince"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
HRH The Duchess of Cambridge and HRH Prince George of Cambridge v OK! [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 9:17 am
If your name’s not down… 159-167 Prince of Wales Road RTM Company Ltd v Assethold Ltd (2024) EWCA Civ 1544 A short but unusual point on right to manage applications arose in this second appeal. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:46 pm
The State invited her to be director in large schools in the central region of Porto Alegre (near where we lived), but she also never accepted. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:59 am
Section II-A argued that the test of Lemon v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:46 pm
The apparent justification was that she was a family member of a PEP, a reference to her father, who is the son of Prince Michael of Kent and 43rd in line to the throne. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
The designation "Fürst", and its feminine form "Fürstin", mean "prince" and "princess" respectively. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:33 pm
This is kind of ridiculous even without the Roman numerals (though I could give you about XCIV reasons why you shouldn’t go above V with those). [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:58 pm
He guards the sleep of his pauper master as if he were a prince. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 8:43 am
Prince George School Board, and Arnold v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
Here the state adopts an approach emblematic of private governance. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:30 am
What makes it marginal is not Texas v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 5:56 am
Seng v. the TMO On 20 February 2019, the TMO rejected the trade mark application (Decision [2019] No. 34784, ‘the TMO’s decision’) for violating Article 10.1(8) of the Trade Mark Law of China (TML, 2013 Amendment),* an absolute ground for refusal and invalidity that applies when a sign is ‘detrimental to socialist morality or mores or having any other adverse effect’. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:18 am
Princess Caroline’s new application to the court appears to be something of a repeat of her previous case, as it concerns the publication, without her consent, of photographs of her and her husband, Prince Ernst August von Hannover, and stories about her private life. [read post]
