Search for: "State v. State Racing Commission" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ressam, No. 07-455 A circuit court's decision setting aside defendant's conviction on a count of carrying an explosive "during the commission of" a felony is reversed where, under a natural reading of 18 U.S.C. section 844(h)(2), since defendant was carrying explosives when he feloniously made a false statement to a customs official, he was carrying them "during" the commission of that felony. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am by Myron Orfield
As Richard Nixon’s HUD secretary and attorney general, they brought the case that persuaded the Eighth Circuit: United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:47 am by Lawrence Solum
Federal Election Commission, extended beyond the trumpeting of an absolutist vision of the First Amendment that allows corporations to spend unlimited sums independently to support or oppose candidates for office. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by Lawrence Solum
Federal Election Commission, extended beyond the trumpeting of an absolutist vision of the First Amendment that allows corporations to spend unlimited sums independently to support or oppose candidates for office. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Federal Election Commission, extended beyond the trumpeting of an absolutist vision of the First Amendment that allows corporations to spend unlimited sums independently to support or oppose candidates for office. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
Supreme Court’s 2019 Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Hayley Evans
In addition to regulating behavior during armed conflict, Protocols II and V, specifically, require parties to a conflict to take specific measures post-conflict to reduce the dangers posed by mines, booby traps, and other forms of unexploded and abandoned ordnance. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by Asbestos Litigation
Within seven days the Commission should continue processing the project come to approve on second vote, without amendments, or take another decision. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:08 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Federal agencies were at the heart of segregating the suburbs before and even after Brown v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
The challengers’ jurisdictional statement claims that the three-judge district court for the Eastern District of Virginia erred in determining that race did not predominate as a redistricting criterion. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]