Search for: "Stewart, Appeal of"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 2,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 12:21 pm
When Justice Elena Kagan followed up, pressing Stewart to explain what kinds of terms would be immaterial – so that their breach would not justify a False Claims Act suit – Stewart took the position that all of the government’s contract terms are material. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
This appeal is yet another example of why change is necessary. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:53 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in the case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
Data Protection and privacy insight has a blog post by Stewart Room “Privacy stifles innovation and competitiveness? [read post]
21 May 2016, 10:01 pm
Stewart and Michael Parnell, along with Mary Wilkerson — all three associated with the Peanut Corporation of America — have appealed both their convictions and sentences to the 11th Circuit in Atlanta. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
This is a live blog of the reclaiming motion (appeal) hearing in the challenge brought by Joanna Cherry QC MP and others for judicial review of the Government’s ability to prorogue the UK Parliament. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Federal district courts decided against the government, but two U.S. courts of appeals issued temporary restraining orders against further publication pending appeal. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:34 pm
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Stewart M. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 9:22 am
The level of interest expressed in connection with the million dollar malpractice verdict against Gunster recently upheld by the 4th DCA [click here] is so high, I've decided to post copies of the 200+ pages of appellate briefs filed in that case as follows: Initial Brief of Appellants, Gunster Yoakley and Daniel Hanley Appendix to Initial Brief of Appellants, Gunster Yoakley and Daniel Hanley Answer Brief of Appellees Initial Brief of Cross-Appellants … [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:15 am
United States), and here (Stewart v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 5:46 pm
”: Consumers get little credit in recent court decision – Boston lawyer Valerie Sussman of Sullivan & Worcester on the firm’s blog, Trending Trademarks Victims of Domestic Violence and Stalking: Protections at Work – Miami lawyer Lisa Berg of Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson on the firm’s blog, BeLabor the Point Client Development: Use the Internet to Amplify Reach of Weak Ties – Dallas, Texas lawyer coach Cordell Parvin… [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 12:40 pm
Stewart; and former State Department Legal Adviser William H. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Section B stresses trade-offs, especially concerning course books’ purposes and scope; Section C stresses opportunities the digital format offers, highlighting the appeal of digital methods to produce supplements, maintain a work’s currency, and facilitate skills training; and Section D discusses matters of presentation that creators of print and digital materials alike must address to promote usefulness – and calls for vigilance against associated risks. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
Stewart & Co. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:05 am
Stewart, 967 S.W.2d 419, 435 (Tex. [read post]
13 May 2007, 4:52 pm
Melendez was cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lightning is cruel and unusual@ Furman 408 U.S. at 309 (Stewart, J., concurring). [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
Senior and former Chief Judge Schwartz may not necessarily know how to specifically define a "depraved mind", but like Potter Stewart ala pornography, he knows it when he sees it, and he minces no words in describing it in Bonilla v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:01 am
We all like to feel like we have the inside track; having an attorney who is publically recognized for his or her work is like having Martha Stewart catering your dinner party. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:17 am
Section B stresses trade-offs, especially concerning course books’ purposes and scope; Section C stresses opportunities the digital format offers, highlighting the appeal of digital methods to produce supplements, maintain a work’s currency, and facilitate skills training; and Section D discusses matters of presentation that creators of print and digital materials alike must address to promote usefulness – and calls for vigilance against associated risks. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 9:22 am
The level of interest expressed in connection with the million dollar malpractice verdict against Gunster recently upheld by the 4th DCA [click here] is so high, I've decided to post copies of the 200+ pages of appellate briefs filed in that case as follows: Initial Brief of Appellants, Gunster Yoakley and Daniel Hanley Appendix to Initial Brief of Appellants, Gunster Yoakley and Daniel Hanley Answer Brief of Appellees Initial Brief of Cross-Appellants … [read post]
