Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Farzaneh Badiei
Enforcement of these policies can take place through direct content governance. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to note that “sexual orientation” does not appear on that list. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
To my surprise, California was not such a negative outlier in release practices. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The Supreme Court has articulated the following principles that serve as a framework: Operations of the federal government are undermined when federal agents who are “within the scope of their authority” can be arrested and brought to trial in state court for an alleged offense against the state.[2] “No State government can exclude it from the exercise of any authority conferred upon it by the Constitution, obstruct its authorized officers against its will, or withhold… [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm by centerforartlaw
The disheartening reality of terrorism’s connection to cultural property crime fueled a desire to take a more punitive approach. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 10:21 am by Eric Goldman
”  The alleged failure to warn is not “inextricably linked to [Meta’s] alleged failure to edit, monitor, or remove [] offensive content. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
His §230 study suggests that most hosts take that material down. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
And, she writes, there have been such omissions, pointing, for instance to Harper v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:57 am by Susan Brenner
”   In re Mitchell W., supra (quoting In re Frank V., 233 Cal. [read post]