Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Francisco" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,517
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
May, decided in 1987, and Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tom McCarthy, University of San Francisco School of Law Big changes in scope of field—no such thing really as a TM lawyer when he started; first US TM organization (INTA predecessor) meeting he went to had 200 people. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:00 am by Michael McCann
Daniel Walsh of the Advertising Specialty Institute has a very thoughtful and comprehensive article on the litigation background of American Needle v. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 7:46 pm by Rick
Yesterday, I drove to downtown San Francisco — something which, on a weekday, is definitely not on my list of favorite things to do — to the Hiram W. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) Intangible assets: The 900 pound overlooked economic gurerrilla… (Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) Global – Patents Do poor people like different patents to rich people? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Kevin
Here's a case report describing a recent filing in San Francisco County: Brendan H__ v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:52 pm by Daniel S. Swinton, Esq.
"LegalZoom's business is based on nurturing the false sense of security that people do not need to hire a traditional attorney," says San Francisco attorney Robert Arns, one of the attorneys who filed the lawsuit. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:13 am by Kashmir Hill
ACLU says California DNA law violates privacy [San Francisco Chronicle] Haskell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:09 pm by Kevin
Link: San Francisco ChronicleLink: United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:31 am by John Steele
Superior Court, 705 P.2d 347 (Cal. 1985)(invalidating a contingent fee arrangement in a public nuisance case) with San Francisco v. [read post]