Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard" Results 1161 - 1180 of 7,079
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
On April 22, the Court heard an extended — over seventy minutes long - argument in Ricci v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:02 am by Aaron Lindstrom
 In a remand from the Michigan Supreme Court directing the Court of Appeals to consider Lee’s appeal of this requirement, the Court of Appeals affirmed, in People v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 11:36 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
  In response, the Project stated that such rights may be more limited than the legal rights people have, and may not necessarily include the right to file lawsuits. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:26 am
The form clearly indicates that the jury awarded $22,500 for each of the 30 separate songs.Sony v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:33 pm by Michael DelSignore
  There have been challenges to abortion before, but none as flagrant as the case that the Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments on called Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
If this Court were to endorse and condone this abrogation of Hopi law, then all of the Hopi Tribe, the Hopi people, would suffer a terrible precedent in the Hopi way of life. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:06 pm by Jon Gelman
Experts estimate that more than 100,000 people have died in the last decade from overdoses involving the drugs. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:54 am by Eugene Volokh
It turns out that the Supreme Court has decided this very question, though in a case that nearly all laypeople (and, I suspect, most lawyers) haven't heard of -- Erznoznik v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
As reported by the Christian Post and AP, the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday heard oral arguments in Romeike v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
In a significant decision further deepening Michigan's medical marijuana jurisprudence, the Michigan Court of Appeals, in the case of People v Tony Green, held that non-compensated marijuana transfers from one registered medical marijuana patient to another are immune from prosecution under section 4 of the Medical Marijuana Act (MMMA).This case is significant for two reasons. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 4:44 am by Jon Gelman
Defendants include The Sherwin-Williams Company, ConAgra Grocery Products, DuPont and Atlantic Richfield Company.The People of California v. [read post]