Search for: "US DEPT JUSTICE"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2007, 8:35 pm
(That's from a very useful online summary provided by Professor C. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
Justice Demarest also rejected respondents' reliance on an appellate court precedent, Matter of Balk (125 West 92nd Street Corp.), 24 AD3d 194 (1st Dept 2006) (read here), which affirmed a trial court's valuation of a 30.75% stock interest in a four-apartment Manhattan co-op corporation (read here). [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 12:30 pm
That's what the kids call "fair use. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
With respect to the application for preliminary injunction, Justice Kitzes employed the same analysis (and virtually the same wording) used in Vassilakis but reached the opposite conclusion to grant the application, as follows: As noted, this action is for the dissolution of several trucking corporations and there is conflicting evidence regarding petitioner being an owner of the corporation. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:00 am
Dept. of Justice Acting Deputy Attorney General Gary Grindler Gary Grindler, the second-highest ranking official at the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
The use of this feed on other websites is a copyright violation. [read post]
23 May 2016, 3:22 am
Likewise, Justice Dickerson wrote: We find the reasoning of the [Massachusetts] Supreme Judicial Court to be sound. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:08 pm
” Federated Dept. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Magee, 54 AD3d 14 (1st Dept 2008) (read here) and Arfa v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:23 am
The Dismissal Decision and Appeal In a short Decision and Order, Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Barry R. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:57 am
The test is one of usefulness and reason" (Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 3:08 am
Citing Fedele v Seybert, 250 AD2d 519 [1st Dept 1998], and other Appellate Division cases, Justice Singh states that since Section 1104-a’s enactment, common-law dissolution claims have been sustained only in the most egregious circumstances, in which the majority was accused of systematic looting of corporate assets in flagrant disregard of the rights of the minority shareholders. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Hallberg, 36 AD2d 857, 2nd Dept., 2007). [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:57 am
., 203 AD3d 580 [1st Dept 2022], in which the Court brought to conclusion a putative shareholder derivative lawsuit Adam brought against Libra in 2019, which Justice Bannon dismissed in full, the dismissal of which the appeals court then affirmed in full. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:05 am
Co. v McDonald, 126 AD2d 29, 32 [3d Dept 1987]). [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:18 am
Dept of State Police v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
See Task Force on Policing, Council on Criminal Justice, Duty to Intervene Policy Assessment (January 2021). [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
As Justice Holmes stated in Crowley v Pulsifer (137 Mass 392 [1884]): It is desirable that the trial of cases should take place under public eye, not because the controversies of one citizen are of public concern, but because it is of the highest moment that those who administer [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
Further, it impermissibly co-mingles the civil and the criminal justice system, without the protections granted under the Criminal Justice system for criminal offenses. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
In a previous post, I wrote about the attempt by Merrick Garland's Justice Department in United States v. [read post]
