Search for: "US v. Crawford"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
The standard aims to bring transparency to “the way in which algorithmic tools are being used to support decisions” and especially those decisions with “legal or economic impact on individuals. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:30 am
Nothing to do with us, mate – Google and Facebook http://t.co/pfKbOL0sLe -> Dotcom Loses Lawyers – Then They Erase All History of Him http://t.co/pU34G2RkGR -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-11-12: Supreme Court of Canada to rule on role of good faith in co… http://t.co/Uhxaty3mI3 -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-11-12 http://t.co/hD2LLSRThd -> Supreme Court of Canada ‘updates’ common law to make good faith an… [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am
In certain criminal and sentencing cases (Aprendi; Crawford), Justice Scalia has fashioned a majority with Justices Stevens and Souter. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 9:55 pm
Here's the text of the Settlement Agreement Joe Gratz has more details about the settlement, Settlement Reached in Authors Guild v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:46 am
Feud told the tale of the infamous silver screen ongoing battle between Bette Davis and Joan Crawford. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
In fact, a large reason for the Supreme Court’s decision last year in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:27 pm
So forget Crawford. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:48 am
Another case we’re monitoring is Lewis v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Proctor, No. 07-60011"Defendant's conviction for theft of a firearm, possession of a stolen firearm, and felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed over claims that the indictment should have been dismissed based on unnecessary delay, and that the district court's admission of a 911 tape-recording violated his right of confrontation under Crawford. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Crawford, No. 05-4173-CV-C, 2006WL 1779035 (W.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
FEC (2010) and in Crawford v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:32 am
See, McAllister Hotel, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:18 pm
Shortly after NFIB v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
Philip Randolph Institute), voter‐identification requirements (Crawford v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:56 am
Think Crawford and Heller. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 1:29 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
See Horenstein v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:36 am
”[2] ERISA also has been found to preempt state laws limiting the enforcement of non-competition clauses in Top Hat Plans.[3] This suggests that employers with Top Hat Plans including forfeiture-for-competition clauses could use those forfeiture clauses to enforce restrictive covenants that would otherwise violate state law if provided under an agreement not subject to ERISA. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:41 am
Back in June, in US v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 am
This feed is for personal, non-commercial & Newstex use only. [read post]
