Search for: "United States v. Andrews" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2012, 6:04 am by Staci Zaretsky
Eagles, United Kingdom / Great Britain, Wade H. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Before the discussion, Clare Cushman will introduce viewers to the Society’s newest publication, An Illustrated Guide to the Supreme Court.The Organization of American Historians is circulating the amicus brief it joined in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:00 am
United States, 541 F.3d 785 (8th Cir. 2008)    (2) Is an attorney's faulty advice grounds for setting aside a criminal defendant's guilty plea? [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
 Qatar Airways Group Q.S.C.S v Middle East News UK Limited and others heard on 4 October 2021 (Saini J)  Haviland v The Andrew Lownie Literary Agency Ltd. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Kahn flagged Judge Cooper’s latest opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 12:19 am
Microsoft to determine whether the software giant is responsible in the United States for its patent infringement overseas. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:16 am by Kiera Flynn
  According to Justice Stevens, the president acted “not merely to do justice and avenge Sept. 11,” but instead “to remove an enemy who had been trying every day to attack the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:41 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In Newsweek, Ian McDougall looks ahead at the issues in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Arguments of the United States Assistant to the Solicitor General Benjamin Snyder argued for the United States in support of neither party. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:05 am by Mairead Enright
The Supreme Court judgment of McD v L [2009] IESC 81 makes clear that “[t]here is no institution in Ireland of a de facto family. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Matal, and Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
United States, involving how to determine what constitutes a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, for this blog. [read post]