Search for: "United States v. Bank of the United States" Results 1161 - 1180 of 6,677
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 5:26 pm by James Hamilton
In comments to the SEC, large global audit networks, including the Big Four, said that a new extraterritorial private action for cross-border securities fraud in connection with purchases and sales of securities outside the United States should not be created. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:00 am by Craig Robins
Trustee raised this issue in was the  In re: Galley Case out of Massachusetts, going back to 2008 (United States Trustee v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:00 pm
This would require riding roughshod over Article IV, §1 of the United States Constitution, section 1913, subdivision (a) of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and time honored principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 11:09 pm by Fred Abrams
IN Liquidation accused Strachans of conspiring to defraud the United States as contemplated by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by Marissa Miller
United States, as well as the continuing responses to Newt Gingrich’s recent criticisms of the Court and the federal judiciary. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:37 am by Kevin LaCroix
In a June 13, 2011 opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas, the United States Supreme Court held, by a 5-4 margin, in the Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm by Hilary Hurd
Strawbridge punts the question and suggests that the court follow the model of United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Julian Ku
Instead, Chief Justice Roberts emphasized that “United States Law…does not rule the world,” a phrase he first used in his opinion for the Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am by Anton Metlitsky
 He filed an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and other organizations in support of neither party in Jesner v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by John Elwood
Texas and United States v. [read post]