Search for: "United States v. Brown" Results 1161 - 1180 of 4,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 9:48 pm by Marta Requejo
Contents: Articles THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN UNITED KINGDOM COURTS AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by Merris Amos STATE LIABILITY FOR JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN EUROPEAN UNION AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, by Arwel Davies WHY THE FRENCH DON’T LIKE THE BURQA: LAÏCITÉ, NATIONAL IDENTITY AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, by Myriam Hunter-Henin THE DUTY TO GIVE REASONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, by Jarrod Hepburn THE CONTINUING MYTH OF EURO-SCEPTICISM? [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Matt Danzer
Judge Anna Brown begins with a recitation of the facts, briefly summarized here: Latif and the other plaintiffs, all citizens of the United States, were prevented from boarding flights over U.S. airspace since 2009. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:29 pm by Matt Murphy
” That’s the first line from Justice Kennedy’s plurality opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 8:58 pm
On June 19, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued four employment-related decisions that are briefly summarized as follows:Meacham v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The departure from Abdulaziz  The Secretary of State relied on Abdulaziz v United Kingdom (1985) 7 EHRR 471 in which the Strasbourg Court held that there was no lack of respect for family life in denying entry to foreign spouses. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States came as quite a surprise. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:30 am by John Elwood
United States, 09-10246 (held since 9/27/10 for Freeman) Smith v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 8:53 pm
M & M Savant Limited v Brown and others LRX/26/2006 It is a shame that this case was decided in 2008, and not in 1998 when it would have had a much greater relevance. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Estrada provided a detailed description of the person he had seen, stating he had no doubt defendant was that man. [read post]