Search for: "United States v. Clarke" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:28 pm
A video about her and her family, prepared for the event, is here, and here's a video of Pat discussing overincarceration in the United States. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On 5 May 2011, Mr Justice Tugendhat heard the Pre Trial Review in the linked cases of Modi v Clarke and International Management Group (UK) Ltd v Clarke – due for trial in July 2011. [read post]
8 May 2011, 10:55 pm by Adam Wagner
Clarke also told the conference that states must “send the best possible judges to serve on the Court. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
  Iorworth HOARE v the United Kingdom – 16261/08 [2011] ECHR 722 (12 April 2011)  Convicted sex offender and lottery winner loses Euro human rights appeal against post limitation date. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
By 5-4 decision, the Supreme yesterday put an end to consumer class actions in AT&T v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm by Peter Tillers
.); and (v) Art & Science – the many ways of epistemic insights.He has been awarded grants by German states for development of new ways in teaching functional illiterates mathematics, together with Marie-Cecile Bertau for her Gilgamesh project, as well as for his Theory of Trust project. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 12, 1975. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Clark, John Owen Haley.New Providence, N.J. : LexisNexis, c2010. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:26 pm by alex
Madison, Beyond Invention: Patent As Knowledge Law, 15 Lewis & Clark Law Review 71 (2011) The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Bilski v. [read post]