Search for: "United States v. Classic" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
’”  In their place, we are offered something “new [sic[ and better—a common good constitutionalism grounded in the classical tradition. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 11:44 am by Aziz Huq, Tom Ginsburg, David Landau
As in the United States, successful impeachment globally is quite rare. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 pm by Richard A. Epstein
  Each begins with the sensible assumption that the law as stated in Wickard v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
  Indeed, in comments proffered on the release of the State Council White Paper Tian Peiyan, the deputy director of the Communist Party's Policy Research Office took great pains to contrast the Chinese path of democratic constitutionalism with that advanced by the United States and its larger camp. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:03 am by admin
   “This is a classic case of administrative mismanagement,” said Assemblyman Joseph R. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by Dale Carpenter
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
 The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by Dale Carpenter
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]