Search for: "United States v. FEDERAL COMPANY" Results 1161 - 1180 of 12,463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm by Bona Law PC
This hardly seemed fair, so the United States Supreme Court in the classic case of Illinois Brick v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:54 am
The United States Supreme Court's decision in Thompson is similar to the New Jersey Supreme Court's 1995 ruling in Craig v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:06 am by Spencer Persson
On June 19, 2017, the United States Supreme Court limited the ability of plaintiffs to pursue nationwide class actions in state court. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 1:46 pm by WIMS
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:11 am by Ingrid Wuerth
In Nelson, the plaintiff was recruited in the United States to work for a state-run Saudi Hospital. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
On September 24, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed-in-part and reversed-in-part the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:00 am by Garrett D. Trego
Aug. 22, 2016), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted the motion, but allowed the municipalities to amend their complaints as to their nuisance causes of action. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:29 am by Unknown
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has ruled that the question of whether a repossession company has a right to possess the property at the time of seizure must be determined by state law under the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the "FRCPA"). [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:29 am by Unknown
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has ruled that the question of whether a repossession company has a right to possess the property at the time of seizure must be determined by state law under the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the "FRCPA"). [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:08 am by Steve Satterfield
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan has allowed a putative class action under Michigan law to proceed against several magazine publishers that allegedly sold lists of their customers’ names, addresses, and subscription choices to third parties. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 10:32 am
The United States Supreme Court upheld a provision in a collective-bargaining agreement that clearly and unmistakably requires union members to arbitrate ADEA claims is enforceable as a matter of federal law. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:58 am
The United States Supreme Court has ruled for the plaintiffs in a case involving an assertion of federal pre-emption in litigation involving whether selling "light" cigarettes was deceptive. [read post]