Search for: "United States v. Jones" Results 1161 - 1180 of 3,381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2023, 6:37 am by Noam Biale
United States that the government had to prove that the defendant knew he was an unlawful possessor of a firearm, an element not proven at Jones’s trial. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm by Orin Kerr
Also, King involves privacy in new technologies The nine-to-zero vote in the recent GPS decision, United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:47 am by Jeffrey Vagle
In many cases, this would be true, but consider Justice Sotomayor's warning in her United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:47 am by Jeffrey Vagle
In many cases, this would be true, but consider Justice Sotomayor's warning in her United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:47 am by Jeffrey Vagle
In many cases, this would be true, but consider Justice Sotomayor's warning in her United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 11:15 pm by Yale Law Journal
Smith, Nabiha Syed, David Thaw, and Albert Wong examine the relationship between law enforcement’s use of GPS surveillance technology and the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement in anticipation of the Supreme Court’s upcoming consideration of United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 9:14 am by Shawn R. Dominy
Just as Hollywood has produced some good movies in trilogies, the United States Supreme Court has produced some good case law in trilogies. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]