Search for: "United States v. Means" Results 1161 - 1180 of 29,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 9:30 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
In her first opinion on the United States Supreme Court, Justice Elena Kagan reports the Justices' 8-1 ruling that a consumer debtor cannot deduct the IRS standard automobile ownership costs from his or her disposable monthly income under the means test if the automobile is free and clear. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 7:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
What does this meanstate owned patents can more easily be challenged. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:28 am
Today's BrokeAndBroker.com Blog continues our unique and exhaustive coverage of the epic battle between the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and Gary L. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:45 am by Jim Singer
This week the United States Supreme Court issued a key decision in which it struck down a patent covering a medical testing method, holding that the subject matter is ineligible for patenting under Section 101 of the Patent Act. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, 15-1503, involves the rule of Brady v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:43 pm by Phillips & Cohen
Although both the United States and the United Kingdom are cracking down on corporate fraud and corruption, the U.K. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:25 pm
New York’s Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 63 AD3d 1419The genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State’s Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product within the meaning of Agriculture and Markets Law §200. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 3:02 pm
A slow week in the Ninth means we can stretch back a bit to the interesting decision of United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:00 pm
The IRS refused, and ultimately the Coxes appealed to the United States Tax Court. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:01 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
This means that U.S. citizens who trade in U.S. companies and allege fraud that occurred in the United States lack jurisdiction under Rule 10b-5 if they bought the shares outside of the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
United States, No. 08-728, to address a question that has divided the courts of appeals regarding the operation of the Speedy Trial Act. 1. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
Thursday we began a series on the Second Circuit of Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]