Search for: "Unknown Defendant No. 2"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 2,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2015, 7:00 pm
2. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:20 pm
In proving their case, Plaintiffs provided data from a survey of interviews they conducted with two groups of people, those who were shown Defendants’ merchandise bearing Bob Marley’s image and a control group who were shown a t-shirt bearing the image of an unknown African American man with dreadlocks. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
When the identities of defendants are not known before a complaint is filed, a plaintiff `should be given an opportunity through discovery to identify the unknown defendants, unless it is clear that discovery would not uncover the identities, or that the complaint would be dismissed on other grounds.' Gillespie v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 9:01 am
For some unknown reason, the charge was dismissed. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:13 pm
The three litigants in this case involved 2 women and all the plaintiffs were not Muslim. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
” Id. at *2. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:23 am
During the 11/08 to 2/09 span, daily shortages just from Keno sales ranged from $150 to $1300. . . . [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:22 am
Id. at 10 ("plaintiffs request that the court ‘[p]ermanently enjoin[] [defendant] from continuing to sell or market [the drug] with its current drug label and direct[] [defendant] to seek FDA approval of a new [drug] label"). [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:57 am
Those elements are: (i) a closeness of association between the claimant and defendant, which may for example come into existence where information is communicated to the defendant; (ii) the information should convey to the defendant that serious harm is likely to befall the intended victim if urgent action is not taken; (iii) the defendant is a person or agency who might reasonably be expected to provide protection in those circumstances; and (iv) the… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
., at *2.HoldingBased on Gunn v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:00 am
Counsel said no, the defendant had alleged that he was the same person as the unknown user of the screen name – that was done by the plaintiff only. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
A process server unknown to the party but still a “neutral”? [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:17 am
Incident Response Planning – You Can’t Defend What You Can’t See Given that 97 percent of the IT systems of companies surveyed globally have been breached,[vii] the question of how to protect a network from a breach is effectively a moot point. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
I note from Cooke [42(f)] that the defendant’s submission on that case did not go so far as to say that this could never be done; rather, it was submitted that the court should be “wary” of attempts to rely on inference. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 10:01 pm
Like the 1 percent who defend us, the 2 percent who feed us are largely out of sight and out of mind for the rest of us. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
By the way, note the irony that usually, as in Bryant, it is the defendant who wants the Court to emphasize the declarant’s perspective (because at the outset the declarant understands better than does the questioner that what the declarant is about to say has significance for prosecution), but in the context of a child’s statement, as in the actual Clark case, it’s the prosecutor who wants to emphasize that perspective (because, while the questioner may… [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
By the way, note the irony that usually, as in Bryant, it is the defendant who wants the Court to emphasize the declarant’s perspective (because at the outset the declarant understands better than does the questioner that what the declarant is about to say has significance for prosecution), but in the context of a child’s statement, as in the actual Clark case, it’s the prosecutor who wants to emphasize that perspective (because, while the questioner may… [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:56 pm
Watts, at *2. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
A trial court ruled in the defendants’ favor. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:01 am
The NPA is VERY strange mostly due to the government’s grant of immunity to unknown and uncharged co-conspirators. [read post]
