Search for: "Vessels v. State" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Law Lady
Abuse & Neglect: NEGLECT FINDING REQUIRES PROOF OF MENTAL STATE, DELAWARE SUPREME COURT FINDS, Dep't of Health & Social Servs. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:23 am
(This is part one of a two-part series on the European Court of Human Rights' decision in the Hirsi v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Simon Lester
Third, Congress explicitly recognized that, by definition, support for the construction of foreign vessels used in international trade burdens or restricts U.S. commerce and thus is a proper target for action under Section 301. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:58 am by Ronald Mann
But then along comes a case like Air & Liquid Systems v DeVries, set for argument the last day of the October session. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am by Katitza Rodriguez
It would let a nation claim authority over any of these core cybercrimes if they occur within its territory, or aboard its vessels or aircraft, but also if the offense involves its nationals either as perpetrators or victims or is committed against the state itself. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the third degree if bodily injury results from the defendant operating the auto or vessel in violation of this paragraph. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:46 am
So, here we go - H.R. 2749 – Food Safety Enhancement Act 2009: State Law not preempted. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:57 am by Sophia Tang
The charterer failed to pay hire on time and in September 2011 Spar withdrew the vessels and terminated the charterparties under the cancellation clause, which states: “If the vessel is off-hire for more than 60 days continuously, Charterers have the option to cancel this Charter Party. [read post]
1 May 2007, 3:42 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Intamin, LTD. v. [read post]