Search for: "Walker v. State"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 2,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2012, 2:54 am
The documentary evidence conclusively established that the plaintiff does not have a viable claim of legal malpractice (see Walker v Kramer, 63 AD3d 723; Faden v Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke, LLP, 52 AD3d 652). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Carlton UK Television Ltd., [1999] F.S.R. 610 (C.A.), per Robert Walker L.J. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:21 am
As to indirect infringement, the Court found that, “[c]onsistent with the court’s analysis" in Walker Digital LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 7:46 pm
In a recent case, Tuper v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
In Short v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
In Short v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 2:41 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:43 am
And as in Janus v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:42 am
The “selection of one among several reasonable courses of action does not constitute malpractice” (Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738), and an attorney may not be held liable for “‘the exercise of appropriate judgment that leads to an unsuccessful result'” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 846-847, quoting Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467). [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:53 am
Rocomonde v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am
Their only power -- to seek state punishment for rule violators -- is a regressive function. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 8:14 am
Foto: Recinto de Río Piedras de la UPR (Facebook) Descarga el documento: Conlan V. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:07 pm
Power Auth. v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
See Walker v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 11:48 am
In Walker v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:25 am
In 2015, in Walker v. [read post]
