Search for: "Wells v. State" Results 1161 - 1180 of 66,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:42 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
In its recent judgment in Mulla v State of UP, the Supreme Court has continued with the trend of emphasising the extremely limited scope of the rarest of rare doctrine first formulated in Bachan Singh.This blog has noted Justice Sinha's contribution to the death penalty debate, where he repeatedly emphasised the fundamental precondition in Bachan Singh---that rarest of rare case will be one where 'the alternative option [of life imprisonment] is unquestionably… [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
  The Fourteenth Amendment just implies (at most) that states can take away the right of felons to vote, not that it should (and certainly not that it must). [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Students in school, as well as out of school, are “persons” under our Constitution. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:58 am by Tom Goldstein
  That said, the level of scrutiny must account for states’ wide latitude in implementing their voting systems, as well as the fact that disclosure does not itself prevent speech. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
Hood seemed hopelessly out of his element talking about, well, just about anything you would expect him to know about, but especially the Renfroe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 9:53 am by Eric Goldman
Well, maybe I’m not that surprised people are still suing the site if it’s still around. [read post]