Search for: "York v York" Results 1161 - 1180 of 52,882
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In New York Family Court, a permanency hearing is a legal proceeding designed to determine the long-term plan for children who have been removed from their homes due to abuse, neglect, or other circumstances endangering their well-being. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Additionally, the AD1 noted that the company – a Delaware limited liability company and “resident” of New York – was not served via the Secretary of State.Given those lapses, the case against the Salon was dismissed.They clearly didn’t lose by a hair ….# # #DECISIONM. v 100-106 LLC [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:21 pm by Marc DeGirolami
I have a piece from last Friday's New York Times reflecting on what I've called traditionalism in constitutional law, including various thoughts about some of its challenges and strengths. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Accordingly, the Court said DOC's decision to terminate Petitioner's employment was not an abuse of discretion considering the severity of Petitioner's conduct, which created "a needless risk of serious injury to the inmate" and, citing Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892, held that the penalty imposed does not shock one's sense of fairness, "notwithstanding [Petitioner's] lack of disciplinary record. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Accordingly, the Court said DOC's decision to terminate Petitioner's employment was not an abuse of discretion considering the severity of Petitioner's conduct, which created "a needless risk of serious injury to the inmate" and, citing Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892, held that the penalty imposed does not shock one's sense of fairness, "notwithstanding [Petitioner's] lack of disciplinary record. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
(And that’s with absolutely no consideration, either.)# # #DECISION214 Knickerbocker LLC v S.P. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:45 pm by Howard Knopf
Tawfik has excellent credentials and was cited twice in the landmark 2021 Supreme Court of  Canada decision of York University v. [read post]