Search for: ""John Does" 1-10" Results 101 - 120 of 362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
" Four of the five faculty member plaintiffs filed the suit as "John Does," alleging that they fear serious negative career consequences if identified. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 3:53 am
Identified in court as John Doe 1 or Protected Person 2, his testimony last year in the case of a Missouri inmate has provided fodder for death penalty opponents. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:31 am by Peter Steinmeyer
It also included claims against defendants “John Does 1-10” for Breach of the Duty of Loyalty and Breach of Fiduciary Duty for improperly disclosing certain confidential, proprietary and/or internal business information to third parties, including David. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 5:31 am by Peter (Pete) A. Steinmeyer
It also included claims against defendants “John Does 1-10” for Breach of the Duty of Loyalty and Breach of Fiduciary Duty for improperly disclosing certain confidential, proprietary and/or internal business information to third parties, including David. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:46 am by Sheldon Toplitt
John Does 1-100, Case No. 687191) and subpoenaed the daily newspaper and its Website for the identities of 11 anonymous bloggers because he wanted to learn more about the specific complaints of the pseudonymous posters. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:45 am by Sheldon Toplitt
John Does 1-25 (Case No. 2:10-cv-1275-DAK) cited First Amendment safeguards for unidentified environmental advocates who used the Internet to perpetrate a media hoax on plaintiff Koch Industries, Inc., as the basis for dismissing the company's lawsuit against the anonymous jokesters.In an 18-page memorandum of decision and order, U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:40 am by Sheldon Toplitt
John Does 1-10 (Case No. 2:11-cv-03700) alleged violations of the Lanham Act and the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, along with common law claims of unjust enrichment and unfair competition, arising from sarcastic false tweets under the tag @coventryfirst. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:57 pm
Thomas Gray ruled Monday.The man, now living in Morgan County, is identified in court records as "John Doe. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 9:01 pm by Fred Abrams
 The qi agreement between the IRS and UBS AG played a critical role in the UBS John Doe summons case. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:20 am by Michael Geist
Voltage names as its representative respondent John Doe (linked to a Rogers IP address). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:25 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
John Does 1-10 (Case No. 1:11-cv-00941-CMA-BNB), the plaintiff, part of the M1 Group owned by Najib Makati, Lebanon's Prime Minister, sued anonymous posters who submitted an entry on the company's Wikipedia page alleging that Facconable USA Corp.'s parent M1 Group "is purported to be a strong supporter of Hezbollah," according to Courthouse News Service. [read post]
Factual Allegations against John Doe Defendants Slaughter-weight fed cattle is a commodity underlying CME live cattle futures and options. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 3:34 am
Each attorney represented anywhere from one to 14 sex offenders known publicly as John Does 1 through 30, and four more lawyers represented the defendants -- state, county and municipal officials.The John Does have sued the state, district attorneys, sheriffs and police chiefs, seeking to remain relatively anonymous. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 9:20 am
The suit doesn’t name defendants, except to call them “John Does 1 to 100″ and “ABC Corporations 1 to 5,” according to this story in the Daily Press. [read post]