Search for: ""Terry v. Ohio" OR "392 U.S. 1"" Results 101 - 120 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2019, 6:22 am by MBettman
Ohio392 U.S. 1 (1968) (When police officers have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has just occurred or is about to occur they may engage in a limited search of a person to check for weapons. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am by David Kris
 Conceptually, the idea here seems similar to the split in FISA’s two definitions of “foreign intelligence information,” 50 U.S.C. 1801(e)(1)-(2). [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:58 am by MBettman
Ohio392 U.S. 1 (1968) (When police officers have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has just occurred or is about to occur they may engage in a limited search of a person to check for weapons. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:11 am by Nate Nieman
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), squarely addressed the constitutionality of pat-down searches of individuals in public. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am by Orin S. Kerr
One of the fascinating questions raised by the United States Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 4:48 am by Jeff Welty
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), would have supported the search and seizure, not necessitating the full analysis the majority utilized. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am by Alex Phipps
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), as they had a valid arrest warrant for defendant for a crime involving a weapon, knew he was a member of a gang, and saw another individual leave the house wearing a ballistic vest. [read post]