Search for: "#tompkins, in Re" Results 101 - 120 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2010, 8:03 pm by Diversity Insight
As you’re probably already aware, neither sexual orientation nor gender identity are protected classes under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 7:31 am by Eric Goldman
The email also included multiple bullet points describing changes being made to the TOS, including: We’re adding an arbitration section to our updated Terms of Service. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:37 pm by Bill Marler
Curr Opin Immunol (England). 13(1):96-103. [4]           Tompkin, R.B. 2002. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
Rep. 2 (May 2008) (asserting that $4.85 billion Vioxx settlement was for “nuisance” value"); In re Agent Orange Products Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 145, 171 (2d Cir. 1987) (finding “good reason to view” $180 million Agent Orange settlement as for “nuisance value”). [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The Ninth Circuit recently considered when consumers assent to terms through interacting with a website: Berman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:12 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Photo credit: internet connect hyperlink // ShutterStock Earlier this week, we posted about a Seventh Circuit case where an ambiguous user call-to-action undermined an online contract formation procecss. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Also, this rule will likely be of little value: if you’re going to go through the trouble of having “conspicuous” notice, why would you not just have a check the box? [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:52 am by Peter Breslauer
In re Hyundai and Kia Fuel Economy Litig., No. 15-56014, 2018 WL 505343 (9th Cir. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
As you may be aware, something was brewing at CanLII in recent weeks (and months) so I skipped my last turn as columnist. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Marquan http://t.co/MYq3H00FZS -> 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe http://t.co/DwemQES2F6 -> China blocks Flickr and OneDrive http://t.co/Xwug6mDRn6 -> Weatherley: ‘Cutting off ad revenue to illegal sites is key to piracy battle’ | Music Week http://t.co/FYUoYJZwl5 -> German government to drop Verizon because of US spying http://t.co/LVuJrAnPBN -> Chairman Jean-Pierre Blais speech on how… [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 11:12 am
Tompkins is best known for its statement that “[t]here is no federal general common law. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Steve Lubet
” The letter called for a completely independent re-analysis of the PACE trial data, since the authors have refused to publish the results they outlined in their original protocol. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 3:53 am by Peter Mahler
According to Alan Leonard and the complaint he filed in the Tompkins County Supreme Court, Steve Cummins does not own Cummins Nursery. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
The court threw out a lot of claims but not all of them.We're going to go through Guinan I first, but quickly (yeah, right, we know you guys), because it's necessary to understand Guinan II - the one we're most interested in.The remaining claims in Guinan I were malpractice (medical negligence), informed consent, fraud/misrepresentation, and medical monitoring.The first question was choice of law. [read post]