Search for: "*/**u.s. v. Brand"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2018, 9:57 am
Pinkette Clothing, the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm
A majority of the full U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:09 am
In the U.S. [read post]
Planned Parenthood’s Ex-Director of Multicultural Brand Engagement Files Race Discrimination Lawsuit
16 Nov 2022, 12:58 pm
The case is Nicole Moore v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 5:02 am
The post JORDAN v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:24 pm
In Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
The Court ruled in Pliva v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 3:00 am
Schaefer appealed in the U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
Further, Huawei argues that the way in which members of Congress spoke about Huawei in the bill’s legislative history, as well as the fact and manner of the ban, have the effect of branding it “disloyal. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 9:59 pm
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D Inc. et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 9:06 am
Perhaps more importantly, as mentioned above, Bridgestone owns a federally registered trademark for restaurant and bar services, which according to the U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 9:06 am
Perhaps more importantly, as mentioned above, Bridgestone owns a federally registered trademark for restaurant and bar services, which according to the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:11 am
Jun 29: In the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:14 am
Tire maker entitled to recover on injunction bond for wrongful prohibition on sale of certain brand tires. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:23 am
Penguin Brands, Inc., No. 1:11-cv-00203-S (filed May 18, 2011).JJI International, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:26 pm
Supreme Court in KSR v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 4:36 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: S&M Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:36 pm
Name-Brand Retailer Can Pursue False Ad Suit Against Wholesaler of Counterfeit JeansThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Famous Horse, operator of the name-brand clothing retailer V.I.M., had standing to assert a Lanham Act claim that wholesalers of counterfeit Rocawear jeans falsely advertised that V.I.M. was a satisfied customer, the U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 12:29 am
We sounded the alarm exactly six months ago about a trademark case of great importance to brand owners: B&B Hardware v. [read post]
