Search for: "*douglass v. First" Results 101 - 120 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Returning to Jones’s paper, I noted that one example of awful brevity would be to constitutionalize single-member districts chosen on a first-past-the-post basis. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:49 am by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Anthony and Frederick Douglass Prenatal Non-Discrimination Act this week. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:59 am by Steve Hall
Katyal, the Deputy SG, who has been heading the SG’s office on an acting basis since Obama’s first SG – Elena Kagan – was named to the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Richard Hunt
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 6:06 am by Kurt Bassuener
The inability of these intransigents to agree on how to implement the Court’s first such decision in 2009 in Sejdić and Finci v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
The nation’s African American leaders, from Frederick Douglass on down, were intensely focused on Harlan’s arguments, and he helped to inspire future generations of African American lawyers. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:17 pm by lsammis
Deposition of Fran Greifenberger on July 7th, 2011, in relation to State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:42 pm by Sonia Gill
  Help Advance Legislation to Protect Voting Rights Voting Rights Advancement ActIn 2013, the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am by Guest Blogger
  Like Joseph Story in his 1842 decision in Prigg v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 John Marshall ended his first paragraph in McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
  Seeking to quell worries like these, Charles Cotesworth Pinckney offered the first extended public defense of the Constitution’s relationship to slavery, which not only shaped how that instrument was ratified in South Carolina, but also how generations of historians have interpreted it: By this settlement, we have secured an unlimited importation of negroes for twenty years; nor is it declared that the importation shall be then stopped; it may be continued—we have a… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:52 am by Joseph Fishkin
  In the 2005 Supreme Court case of Castle Rock v. [read post]