Search for: "*humphrey v. U.s" Results 101 - 120 of 326
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2019, 5:21 am by Lyle Denniston
That sturdy precedent was the Court’s decision in the case of Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:44 am by Thomas Long
The appellate court reversed a district court’s denial of the German company’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and remanded with instructions that the case be dismissed (C5 Medical Werks, LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:57 pm by Robert Margolis
The court affirmed the jury’s verdict that the defendants were guilty of contributory infringement, because with that constructive knowledge, they continued to lease space to those subtenants (Luxottica Grp., SpA v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:17 am by Robert Margolis
The court also affirmed a district judge’s order sanctioning L&L for failing to disclose its third-party license agreement in discovery (Beach Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 2:01 am by Robert Margolis
The appellate court affirmed the lower court’s summary judgment order dismissing all of the corporation’s claims arising out of what the corporation contended was political retribution exacted by the mayor against it (Comite Fiestas De La Calle San Sebastian, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Paul J. Larkin, Jr.
Supreme Court held in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:07 am by Blair Albom
In addition, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying ACT’s request for a permanent injunction because ACT failed to establish that it would sustain irreparable harm (ACT 898 Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 6:55 am by Thomas Long
§9, in favor of a group of individuals from the Bobov Hasidic Jewish community in Brooklyn who claimed exclusive trademark rights to the mark BOBOV, the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Huang, Empirical Analysis of Australian Trademark Infringement Decisions: Implications for the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:43 pm by Erica Vaccarello
In Iancu v Brunetti, the USPTO argues for the permanence of the “immoral or scandalous” provision. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:32 am by Jody Coultas
Jody CoultasKroma Makeup EU, LLC, a trademark licensee, lacked standing to assert trademark infringement claims against the Kardashian sisters and a U.S. beauty product seller, according to the U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:32 am by Brian Craig
’s EquityComp insurance program did not infringe or dilute Applied’s federally registered trademarks by using them in the name of their seminar or the promotional materials related to it, the U.S. [read post]