Search for: "*long v. Murphy" Results 101 - 120 of 752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Servs., Inc., 188 AD3d 624, 626 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Murphy v Kuhn, 90 NY2d 266, 270; MAAD Constr., Inc. v Cavallino Risk Mgt., Inc., 178 AD3d 816, 818). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
On Monday 11 October 2021, the Labour Party named Seumas Milne, Karie Murphy, Georgie Robertson, Laura Murray and Harry Hayball as the individuals responsible for leaking the report entitled “The work of the Labour Party’s Governance and Legal Unit in relation to antisemitism, 2014-2019. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm by John Elwood
Tennessee, 22 Orig. 143, involving a long-running dispute between those two states (and Memphis, Tennessee) over the apportionment of groundwater. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm by Matt Murphy
The following article was written by Matt Murphy and Tommy Murphy of Murphy Law Firm for the Autumn 2020 edition of Trial Trends. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:41 am by Matt Murphy
The following article was written by Matt Murphy of Murphy Law Firm and Kiel Duckworth of Duckworth Law Office for the Summer 2021 edition of Trial Trends. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 11:44 am by Kevin Kaufman
The relatively recent expansion of sports betting in the U.S. is a result of the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 5:56 am by John Jascob
According to Berkovitz, sports betting has expanded rapidly since 2018, when the Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
I’ve blogged many cases where Section 230(c)(1) did apply to contract breach claims (and I’ll blog another one soon), including Murphy v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 1:02 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued its long-awaited opinion in Gun Owners of America v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:33 am by Christopher Tyner
Judge Murphy concurred in result only, expressing the view that the majority improperly equated removal and confinement when analyzing the defendant’s motion to dismiss the kidnapping charge. [read post]