Search for: "*southern Home v. Thomas" Results 101 - 120 of 211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2017, 7:22 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
” One late night over a year after he was fired, Cuellar accessed the account at his home in Washington State. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
 As I mentioned, I got interested in libertarian ideas in high school and read a lot of the usual suspects: Milton Friedman, von Mises, Ayn Rand, Frederick Douglass, Thomas Paine, and Thomas Szasz. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Wei Li, Montefiore East Tremont Practice, Off¬Label Medical Device use by Surgeons Public Health Law Session 1E – Room 242Overarching Themes in Public Health LawModerator: Jonathan Todres, Georgia State University College of LawLance Gable, Wayne State University Law School, Public and Private Models of Public Health Governance in Trump’s AmericaLewis Grossman, American University Washington College of Law, The Taming of Progressive ‘State Medicine’James Hodge, Arizona… [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
It will look back to several important recent Supreme Court decisions, in particular Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:34 pm by Jamie Baker
Professor Gossett’s article, If Charity Begins at Home, Why Do We Go Searching Abroad? [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am by Marty Lederman
 In such a case, unfortunately, the beneficiaries of church plans, including the employees of the nursing homes operated by Little Sisters, will not receive coverage for contraception. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am by Marty Lederman
 Three of those five petitioners (Catholic University, Geneva College, and Oklahoma Baptist University) also offer their students an insured plan, as does a sixth petitioner, Southern Nazarene University. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The Chief Justice wrote the majority opinion, and Justice Scalia dissented, joined by Justices Alito and Thomas. [read post]