Search for: "*u.s. v. Gant"
Results 101 - 120
of 358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2010, 6:45 am
Gant, 129 S. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:02 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Arizona v Gant, 556 U.S. ___, 129 S Ct 1710, 173 L Ed 2d 485 (2009), which abrogated the well-established rule in New York v Belton, 453 U.S. 454; 101 S Ct 2860; 69 L Ed 2d 768 (1981) and its progeny, we must consider whether an officer's good faith reliance on case law that is later overturned may form a proper basis to avoid the operation of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:01 pm
Yesterday the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
See Chimel, 395 U.S. at 763; see also Atwater v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:06 am
McKnight, 2010 U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:15 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:34 pm
Gant, 556 U.S. ___ (2009). [read post]
CA6: In SI, it is how defendant could have got to part of car searched, not how officer actually did
7 May 2011, 4:46 am
[This is also a Gant non-retroactivity case.] [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:47 am
Gant, 2010 Ore. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:31 am
Carr, 2010 U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 4:29 am
Aldin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
Gant, 556 U.S. ___ (2009). [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 3:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:41 am
A vehicle frisk would have been valid here under Gant and Long. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:41 am
A vehicle frisk would have been valid here under Gant and Long. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:17 am
United States v. [read post]
