Search for: "1st Judicial District Court" Results 101 - 120 of 1,153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2022, 6:58 am by Daniel Miller
The Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, recently affirmed a trial court’s order confirming a judicial sale of real property collateral following a mortgage foreclosure, as well as the trial court’s denial of the borrower’s motion to reconsider that order. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Introduction   Five years ago, we surveyed a decade’s worth of federal district court decisions on motions to dismiss securities claims brought against development-stage biotech companies to answer an important question: are these cases more likely to survive a motion to dismiss—and therefore riskier to insure against—than other securities class actions, as D&O insurers have traditionally assumed? [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am by John Elwood
Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 4th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 11th Circuits have held — or whether jail officials who respond unreasonably to the obvious risk should be granted qualified immunity in the absence of a case involving the same facts — as the U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 5:07 am by Russell Knight
Absent leave of court, district transfers must be filed no later than 30 days after service of summons, not counting the day of service. [read post]
31 May 2022, 10:49 pm
Nordby, shock the world and don’t name Judge Francis as a nominee.SincerelyCaptain JusticeFor the Justice Building BlogTHE APPLICANTS INCLUDE:Jeffrey Albinson, a lawyer with the Golden Scaz Gagain firm;Edward Artau, a judge on the 4th District Court of Appeal; Steve Berlin, a judge on the 6th Judicial Circuit;Hunter Carroll, a judge on the 12th Judicial Circuit;Eric Eisnaugle II, a judge on the 5th District Court of Appeal;Stephen Everett,… [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Troy Kessler
Local Union 2209, a federal district court ruled that an employee’s Title VII rights were not violated when his union required “independent corroboration” of alleged sincerely held religious beliefs that prohibited him from paying union dues. 164 F. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am by John Elwood
The Axon district court dismissed the suit for want of jurisdiction, concluding that Congress had implicitly precluded district-court jurisdiction over such actions by creating a statutory review scheme for FTC cease-and-desist orders that bypasses district courts and vests judicial review directly in the courts of appeals. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:21 am by GSU Law Student
Higher Court of Justice (STJ) –Plenary of the 1st Section – Judgment Session. [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:54 pm by Angie Gou
” Corinne Beckwith, a judge on the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, said that Stevens was “unwaveringly open-minded,” and wanted to consider a range of views “including, for some reason, ours. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:47 am by Michael
Several, but not all, of the listed factors correspond with those set out by the Texas Supreme Court in Holley, 544 S.W.2d at 371–72. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 1:16 pm by Andrew Hamm
District Court for the Central District of California did not hold any jury trials until May 2021. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 2:07 pm by Russell Knight
“The conciliation conference and counseling shall take place at the established court conciliation service of that judicial district or at any similar service or facility where no court conciliation service has been established. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 6:12 pm by Howard Friedman
  The opinion said in part:While I am not sure that the Navy is entitled to any relief at this stage, I am also wary, as was the District Court, about judicial interference with sensitive military decision making. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew Ackerman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which covers Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
[And] [n]otable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention, Federalist No. 78, and Marbury v. [read post]