Search for: "9th Judicial Circuit Family Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2011, 5:45 pm
Footnote 2 Courts in the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 9th, and 10th Circuits have held that damages under § 1983 are impermissible. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
Haeger The genesis for this case was a 2003 RV accident involving the Haeger family. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
The Sixth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
Circuit Court of Appeals Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
Questions in the Tom Kabinet CJEU reference finalized (at last) | Court of Appeal, following EPO, reverses Carr J in Regeneron v Kymab dispute | Regeneron v Kymab - Part I: Sufficiency | How do you protect patents from judicial and expert hindsight? [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
The Court observed that the Sixth Circuit has adopted a “restrictive reading” of this exception. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 8:34 am
Sanai filed a complaint against Kozinski alleging misconduct, and the 9th Circuit's Judicial Council launched a limited inquiry. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:06 am
Courts of Appeals for the 4th, 9th and 10th Circuits. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:35 am
Prior to the ReDigi decision, in 2010 the 9th Circuit issued its judgment in Vernor v Autodesk (a case concerning promo CDs), in which it ruled that, pursuant to 17 USC §109(d) the first sale doctrine does not apply to a person who possesses a copy of a copyright-protect work without owning it. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 6:51 am
There is one more pending case on the same issue with the same parties–this one in the 9th Circuit. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 6:40 pm
Our local bankruptcy judges are bound by what the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel decides. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
`A circuit court's decision with respect to a motion to quash a bindover order is not entitled to deference because this Court applies the same standard of review to this issue as the circuit court. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
§ 1396a(a)(30)(A) of the Medicaid Act by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement rates may be held preempted by Section 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the statute.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition of respondent Independent Living CenterBrief in opposition of respondents… [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, then sought to add her spouse to her health plan. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am
Opinions below (9th Circuit): Denial of motion to vacate; opinion Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of respondent Independent Living Center Brief in opposition of respondents Sacramento Family Medical Clinics et al. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
In fact, the Supreme Court judicial selection process is well known by scholars to be one of the most difficult to study. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and 9th U.S. [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:40 am
Spirit's album The Family that Plays Together was in his collection while he was still a sixth-former. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:46 am
Opinions below (9th Circuit): Denial of motion to vacate; opinion Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of respondent Independent Living Center Brief in opposition of respondents Sacramento Family Medical Clinics et al. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:06 pm
He urges the 9th Circuit to overrule a federal district court judge's dismissal of the case. [read post]
