Search for: "A CHOICE FOR WOMEN V. AGENCY FOR HEALTH"
Results 101 - 120
of 203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
If enacted into law, the Women’s Health Protection Act would codify the right to terminate a pregnancy, while the Ensuring Access to Abortion Act would prohibit interference with interstate abortion services. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:21 am
Roy and Lyng v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
McRae and Webster v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:21 am
In Strickland v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The matter must either relate to serious misconduct, or it must otherwise be important for safeguarding the public welfare in matters of health and safety (or of comparable public importance) that the information should be known to whom it is disclosed. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
The decision in Reidel v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:30 pm
The consolidated cases are Sebelius v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:15 am
Last month I published a post here about the Solicitor General’s nominal “Petition for Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am
In that action, three hospitals affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Health Plan, an HMO, have appealed a ruling by the federal district court for the District of Columbia holding that, although the hospitals did not directly contract with the federal government, they were still subject to OFCCP jurisdiction as federal subcontractors (UPMC Braddock v Harris, March 30, 2013, (96 EPD ¶44,801)). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
In Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 3:21 am
The briefing observes that “[a]n access to information approach to gender equality and women’s empowerment means ensuring women are able to access information to make informed choices on elements of their lives, push their governments and other power-holders to guarantee their rights, have greater agency and control over their lives, and more meaningfully engage in public life. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
In a recent report, Viral V. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:31 am
In the Supreme Court decision of Oncale v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
The sources were so impeccable that we had no choice to run the story in the way we did. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:53 am
CARVIN: Violence against women obviously creates the same negative impression on fellow citizens as this communicable disease, but the –and it has huge effects on the health care of our country. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Ordinarily, courts are exceedingly deferential to an agency’s interpretation of its own rules, and for good reason: the agency wrote them, after all. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The Financial Conduct Authority has announced it is continuing the initiative to provide synthetic data sets “to help increase innovation and choice in financial services. [read post]
